Talk:Turbofuel

Suggestion: Seems like the JetPack should be able to run on turbo fuel. Azeroth2b87517 (talk) 04:18, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
 * We are wiki worker, not devs, sorry cant help you.～～～～ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.65.35.203 (talk • contribs) at 04:50, 13 May 2019‎ (UTC). Please sign your posts with
 * I know who you are - I've been told the DEVs are also reading the wiki. Azeroth2b87517 (talk) 13:03, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The probability a dev might see this here is close to zero. Use their official website for suggestions like this: https://questions.satisfactorygame.com/ --Cadaei (talk) 16:35, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Turbo fuel has a reddish icon now. Kwjcool321 (talk) 17:26, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

I made a change that probably didn't work
The turbofuel crafting recipes aren't showing up at all. So after comparing the source with other pages that did have their recipes, I decided the change the capitalization of the CraftingTable calls. I'm not sure if the crafting_recipes table takes time to update itself or if the changes I made don't matter because it's not case sensitive. I should note that the crafting recipes for turbofuel do appear on the alternate hard drive recipes page table. This is my first time editing a wiki page so I hope I didn't pull a stupid move or make unnecessary work for anyone. DavidTriphon (talk) 01:50, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * This appears to be a bigger problem. Neither Turbofuel or Packaged Turbofuel recipes are stored in cargo, yet the somehow appear on the Hard Drive page...? Ondar111 (talk) 09:47, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Update: they disappeared from the Hard Drive page after a purge. The problem seems to lie in the recipe not being stored to cargo. Ondar111 (talk) 12:27, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I see the recipes on the page now. Thanks for fixing it Ondar! :) DavidTriphon (talk) 09:40, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Credit goes to Mr Pie 5. The issue was caused by the infobox having "N/A" stack size, while that parameter only expected an integer to be input. Ondar111 (talk) 09:56, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * ThanksMr Pie 5! I'm thankful that you figured out how to fix it. DavidTriphon (talk) 00:30, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

New Analysis Seems Unnecessary
I'm not sure a fuel vs turbofuel analysis should be on this page. If anywhere it should be on the fuel generator page. But even beyond that this flawed (even before double-checking math). Comparing weighted resource usage is odd, because the goal seems to be to point out how much sulfur it's using. But, turbofuel is one of the primary usage of sulfur. And the other uses either of sulfur don't need much or don't provide much benefit compared to turbofuel. Using sulfur here gives you extra power and simplifies logistics by needing less pipes. It would only become an issue if scaled up really large, but using fuel instead is hardly the remedy for really large power usage; that's what nuclear is for.

Also there isn't enough oil for to make that much energy from fuel. There's only 11,700.

Lundurro (talk) 19:56, 8 July 2021 (UTC)